-IDEOLOGICAL TARGETS-
COPYRIGHT(c)2008, by Carlos Mijares Poyer
The last names of ideology have mainly saturated public opinion into ideological confusion and indecision, through media, in the streets of the world, and in some academic instances. There is no room -scientific or social- for impartial postures, even if they seem pleasurable, hedonistic, convenient to interests, etc. History has proven with results and verifiable outcomes, and history is also being recurved with this situation,-the symptoms of this fact, that becomes and tries to allow different sorts of violence, and other scenarios.
Human resources, their future, their lives, do not entirely and primarily depend, for their management [on] management, they are better sustained through the completion and keeping and realization of the same laws which have always been there, in essence and fact. The remastering of laws or situations, the invention of new masks for selected entities -or in any case- for all realms and considerations and situations, does not guarantee solutions, even in their immediacy. Much less, are new and effective procedures and methods or the decision making around the management of processes and outcomes provide the effects of new and positive results for global communities; precisely, for they are global, indeed, and controlled. Organization is needed when it manifests itself as development and a road with a future to follow, or that is able to be followed, which is really the main problem right now.
Capsuled private theories or cooperative thought scenarios may give new ideas and strategie even without major conveniences and interests excelled.
However, it is the organization of critical thought, through developing psychological practices which tend statistically to provide desired results, in the sense of consensus, where possible, for many people, and the evolving agreements they can generate.
Dualistic proposals on politics and economics become if old, interpreters of the reception of new answers and propositions, for the betterment of the human condition throughout history.
Let us stay away from endless rhetorical terms like: capitalism, communism, imperialism, dictatorship, totalitarianism, etc. All part of their own procedures which survive dialectically, but not factually, with visible and qualitative endeavours.
Rhetoric in these days, may lack -if cajoled in its essences- the freedom to promote happiness.
